Fully Insured vs Self Insured: Best Health Plan for Your Business

Discover the pros and cons of fully insured vs self insured health plans to determine the best option for your business’s healthcare needs.

Starting my own company, handling health insurance proved to be somewhat difficult. I recall restless nights spent reading innumerable papers and insurance documentation in search of the best solution for my staff and business.

Having more than ten years of experience as a business owner and healthcare consultant, I have witnessed firsthand how important the proper health insurance plan is for employee well-being and corporate success.

Early on, I selected a fully insured health plan without really knowing what it meant. At first, it looked predictable and reasonably priced; nevertheless, as my company developed, I soon found it lacked flexibility. This motivated me to investigate self-insured plans more closely.

After much study and some trial and error, I found that, despite the higher risks, self-insurance could be a reasonable choice for many firms. My personal experiences as well as my professional expertise form the foundation of this guidance. It seeks to streamline the variations between self-insured and fully insured health plans.

We’ll examine their advantages, drawbacks, expenses, and which companies they might fit best. We will also go over pertinent subjects such as administrative duties, legal concerns, risk management, and employee benefits.

With real-world examples, present trends, and useful advice, I wish to equip you with the knowledge required to make wise decisions. You will be able to avoid the mistakes I did by knowing in the end which insurance type would be ideal for your company.

Let’s dive in.

What is a Fully Insured Health Plan?

Photo: Canva

What Fully Insured Means?

“Fully insured” basically means the employer passes the financial risk of medical claims to the insurance company. Usually, this design entails paying the insurer a monthly premium per employee.

What is a Self Insured Health Plan?

On the other hand, a self-insured (or self-funded) health plan lets the company itself bear the financial risk for offering staff members medical advantages. The employer pays for medical claims out-of-pocket as they happen, not fixed premiums to an insurance company. Third-party administrators (TPAs) are hired by companies sometimes to conduct administrative chores and claim management.

Self Insured vs Fully Insured Pros and Cons

Both types present special opportunities as well as difficulties:

AspectFully InsuredSelf Insured
Cost PredictabilityHigh – Fixed premiumsVariable – Claims fluctuate
RiskLower – Risk on insurerHigher – Risk on employer
FlexibilityLower – Standard plansHigher – Customizable plans
Regulatory ComplianceMore oversightLess oversight
Administrative ResponsibilityLower – Managed by insurerHigher – Managed internally/TPA
Cost ControlLimitedGreater control over costs

Cost Comparison: Self Insured vs Fully Insured Plans

Fully Insured Costs

Usually based on administrative expenses and expected healthcare expenditures, fully insured plans pay premiums. Although this provides cost consistency, companies could find themselves paying more in premiums than the actual claimed losses.

Self-Insured Expenses

Particularly for companies with a healthy workforce, self-insured plans can be more affordable. They do, however, run the danger of maybe high claims in any one year. Companies have to have enough savings to meet these erratic expenses.

Financial Reversals

Selecting either fully insured or self-insured plans has major cost consequences. For financial planning, fully insured plans offer budget certainty—a benefit. Self-insured plans, on the other hand, provide possible savings but call for thorough risk analysis and cash flow control.

Fit for Companies

Small Companies

Usually better suited for small enterprises because of consistent expenses and reduced administrative load, fully insured policies Small businesses can lack the financial capacity to manage significant, unanticipated claims.

Self-insured small enterprises run a risk without enough cash on hand. If tiny companies can properly control the risks, those with somewhat high staff numbers could find this strategy useful.

Big Business

While still practical, big companies may find less appealing fully insured plans because of higher rates and less flexibility.

Often more suited for big companies with significant cash reserves and advanced HR departments is self-insured. These companies can better control the hazards and gain from possible cost reductions and customizing of their plans.

Management of Risk: Fully Insured vs Self Insured

Fully Insured Risk

Plan design and cost control are under employers’ limited influence. Premiums may vary greatly depending on the assessment of the risk profile of the company by the insurer.

Self-Insured Risks

High Claims: Possibility of major, erratic medical claims. Variations in cash flow might result from changing expenses.

Controlling Fully Insured Risks

Negotiate multi-year premium rates for premium stabilization. Choose designs for your plans that strike a mix between coverage and cost.

Control of Risks Self-Insured

Get stop-loss insurance to reduce your exposure to large claims. Programs for employee wellness help to lower claims by improving their general state of health.

Legal and Regulatory Issues

Fully Insured

State laws control fully insured plans. This covers consumer safeguards, reporting rules, and requirements on coverage kinds and degrees.


Federal restrictions such as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) essentially control self-insured plans. This gives more freedom but also more duty on the company to follow government rules.

Problems with Compliance

Fully Insured

State Compliance: Have to follow state insurance policies and requirements. Regular reports to state insurance agencies.


Must follow ERISA, COBRA, HIPAA, and other federal rules. More thorough disclosure obligations to staff members.

Employee Benefits: Self vs Fully Insured

Fully Insured

Employees get consistent benefits provided by their insurance company. Less customizing: Restricted capacity to fit benefits to particular staff requirements.

Self Insurance

Customizable Plans: Companies can match benefits to the particular requirements of their staff. Capacity to launch creative wellness and health initiatives is vital.

Effects on Customer Contentment

The consistency and predictability of fully insured plans are much valued by employees. Self-insured plans, on the other hand, can provide more tailored benefits, hence improving employee retention and satisfaction.

Administrative Duties

Fully Insured

Minimal Admin: The insurance company handles most of the administrative chores. Less internal resources needed means simpler implementation and management of this project.


Higher Admin: Needs either strong internal administration or a TPA. More sophisticated administration of claims, compliance, and staff communications in general.

Management’s Complicity

Managing a self-insured plan calls for greater knowledge and tools. Big companies with focused HR and benefits departments are more suited to manage these complications.

Patterns and Discoveries

Modern Trends

Because of possible cost savings and flexibility, more companies are looking at self-insured strategies. Using data analytics will help one forecast and control healthcare expenses.

Professional Views and Future Forecasts

Particularly in big companies, experts forecast a continuous move toward self-insured policies. Advances in analytics and healthcare technology will propel this trend even more by allowing better cost control and risk management.

How to Change Model Approaches?

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1) What’s the difference between self-insured and fully-insured?

While fully insured plans entail paying premiums to an insurance company assuming the risk, self-insured plans indicate the employer bears the financial risk for offering healthcare benefits.

2) What does it mean to be fully insured?

Being fully insured means that the employer pays fixed rates to an insurance carrier, who then handles and funds employee healthcare claims.

3) Is it better to be self-insured?

It relies on the particular situation of the company. Though they come with more financial risk and administrative duties, self-insured plans can offer cost savings and flexibility.

4) How do I know if my insurance is self-funded or fully funded?

See your HR department or review your insurance paperwork. Whereas fully funded plans include paying premiums to an insurer, self-financed plans usually entail direct claim payment by the employer.

5) What are the disadvantages of self-insurance?

Higher financial risk, variable cash flow, and more administrative work are drawbacks. Employers must be skilled in handling the complexity of self-insured plans and have large reserves to pay claims.

6) Why would a company choose to be self-insured?

Self-insurance offers companies freedom in plan design, more control over benefits customizing, and cost savings. Self-insured plans can let companies keep unneeded money instead of paying premiums.

7) Why is self-insurance not feasible?

Small firms without the financial stability to manage significant, unanticipated healthcare expenses may find self-insurance impossible. Without a dedicated HR team or outside administrator, the administrative weight and complexity could also be too taxing.

8) Why would large employers decide to self-insure?

Many times, large companies have the administrative and financial means necessary to properly run self-insured plans. Potential cost reductions, customized health coverage, and better understanding of employee healthcare utilization will help them.

9) When should a company self-insure?

If a company has a strong financial situation, a reasonably good personnel, and the administrative tools to oversee the plan, it should give self-insuring some thought. Additionally guiding this choice is doing a comprehensive risk analysis and consulting insurance professionals.

Wrapping Up

Any company would have to make a major choice between a fully insured and a self-insured health plan. Every model has advantages and disadvantages; the optimal one will rely on administrative capacity, risk tolerance, size of the company, and financial stability.

Key Takeaways:

  • Self-insured plans can result in possible savings but come with fluctuating expenses.
  • Fully insured plans provide consistent costs through set premiums.
  • Self-insured plans demand strong risk management techniques like stop-loss insurance.
  • Fully insured plans move risk to the insurer.
  • Self-insured plans offer more freedom in benefit design and can be tailored to satisfy staff requirements, improving satisfaction and retention.
  • Self-insured plans must follow federal legislation like ERISA, requiring stricter administrative control.
  • Fully insured plans are subject to state rules.
  • Small businesses may prefer fully insured plans due to reduced risk and administrative load.
  • Large companies may find value in the cost control and customization possibilities of self-insured plans.
Scroll to Top